The Amazon Brigade of M Gaddafi-President of Libya

 A look at the girls in uniform in the photograph will warm the heart of any cockerel. But friends beware these girls are the personal body guards of Colonel Maummaer Gaddafi , the President of Libya. .


It is a well known fact that those who ride the tiger are eaten by the tiger. But this has not happened in the case of Gaddaffi and he has survived many attempts on his life. Those attempts to kill him, perhaps made him think of a fool proof plan for his security and he hit upon the idea of having female security guards.

The world was witness to these female body guards when Gaddaffi arrived in France on a state visit last year where he was flanked by 30 beautiful guards dressed in blue uniforms. All of them were armed and the popular perception was that they were all ‘virgins’. This of course cannot be vouchsafed.

The body guards are handpicked by Gaddaffi and a look at them will show that they have none of the Islamic trappings about them. The security girls do not hide themselves under a burqua or the hijab.They wear nail varnish, perfumes and lipstick and also style their hair to fit under their caps. They also wear high heels to give them a lovely look. But these girls are also adept at handling guns and can fire them if the need arises.

All the selected girls are trained at a special school and learn to handle fire arms and master the martial arts. Those that pass out successfully after due vetting by Gaddaffi are absorbed as his bodyguards.

The leader is accompanied every where by these girl body guards. In such a scenario the rumors abound and lot many people mention that most of these girls pander to the sexual whims of Gaddaffi. The girls are really motivated as can be seen from the fact that one of the body guards named Aisha was killed and 7 others wounded in an assassination attempt on Gaddaffi in 1998 when Islamic fundamentalists had ambushed his motorcade.  Incidentally Aisha was  the favorite of Gaddaffi.The bodyguard had thrown herself as a human shield and saved Gaddaffi. Gaddaffi is now facing the biggest challenge in the form of popular agitations against his rule, after the ouster of Hosni Mubarak. His body guards  have their work cut out for them.

Barack Hussain Obama-44th President of the USA

 How many people are aware that Barack Hussain Obama the present President of the USA was born a Muslim. He also attended 2 years schooling  in a Madrasa ( Islamic religious School). We also know that holy month of Ramadan was from 11 August 10 to sept 2010. In a press conference during that period  Obama was not wearing his wedding ring nor was he wearing his watch.

When noticed, his staff said his ring was out for repairs. No reason was given for the missing watch.
So it’s just a coincidence that Muslims are forbidden from wearing jewelry during the month of Ramadan???
 Add to this his withdrawal from Iraq and throwing in the towel in Afghanistan and his Cairo university speech where he said 'America will never be or ever was at war with the Muslim world'. Silly, it is the Muslim clergy who has declared America the Great Satan.
I am thinking and dear friend please do so also.

Obama is at the fag end of his term. What is his contribution? Frankly I ddon't see anything except repeated speeches where he always said that there is no danger from islam. Sir, Is he right ?

Where is Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh ?- Under the Chair like the Proverbial Cat in the Fairy tale.

I would like to reproduce in full the article by B Raman, so that people can read it and realize that this Prime Minister needs to be dealt with as enunciated byField Marshal Manekshaw ' Those who talk by the yard, perform by the inch, deserve a kick by the foot'.Wednesday, February 16, 2011


WHAT A FALL WAS THERE, MY COUNTRYMEN

B.RAMAN

Dear Mr. Prime Minister,



Like millions of ordinary Indians, I too watched from the beginning till the end your televised interaction with selected journalists from the electronic media on February 16,2011.
You had never spoken to us, the ordinary people of India, on the various scams which have rocked the country one after another since August last year. Our only source of information has been the media.
As the citizens of this country who put your party in power, we had a right to expect that you will talk to us and explain to us what is the truth and how you intend arresting and reversing the rot that has set in and the continuing decline in the credibility and image of India as a result of the stories of these scams .
These stories---whether correct wholly or only partly--- have brought out one thing loud and clear--- the ineptitude and incompetence of your Government, the poor supervision which seems to prevail in many Ministries and offices, including the Prime Minister's Office, and the insensitivity of many senior members of your Cabinet to public concerns over these alleged scams.
Corruption is nothing new, but the magnitude of it as seen since you came to power has been highly disturbing . What is new is the ineptitude, the incompetence and the lack of supervision which seem to prevail since you came to power--- the like of which one had not seen under any other Prime Minister of India since we became independent in 1947.
You try to blame your difficulties and embarrassments on your having to run a coalition. You are not the first Prime Minister having to run the country at the head of a coalition. V.P.Singh, Chandrasekhar, Deve Gowda, Inder Gujral and Atal Behari Vajpayee headed coalitions too. Despite this, they gave us a government which worked as a team and which did not pull in different directions. I can't recall any instance under the previous coalitions where a Minister repeatedly circumvented the instructions of the Prime Minister, without fearing the consequences of his action.
All the previous Prime Ministers, who headed coalition Cabinets, made it clear to their political associates who the boss was and who would take important decisions. They never tolerated anyone who sought to circumvent their instructions. They never let their political allies dictate terms to them.
This is the first time we are seeing a Prime Minister, who tries to earn not the confidence of the people by projecting himself as a strong leader who will not tolerate any nonsense from his coalition partners, but the pity of the people by projecting himself as a helpless leader, who has nothing but to do what his coalition partners ask him to do.
We watched in utter amazement for one hour on February 16 not the rallying cry of a leader, who has realised the magnitude of the rot and who is determined to set it right whatever be the consequences to his position as the Prime Minister, but an exercise in self-pity of a leader who is at the mercy of his coalition partners and does not have the courage to call them to order.
This was the first time we had an opportunity of listening to you on the State of the country in the light of these scams. We were looking forward not to excuses and pretexts to explain away the sins of commission and omission of your government, but to a bold re-assertion of your leadership as the Prime Minister of this great country, who has the courage to face the people of this country in their eyes and reassure them: Thus far and no further.
I have no doubt in my mind that many right-thinking people of India, like me, must have felt ashamed and enraged as they saw the Prime Minister of this country giving out one excuse after another for not being able to govern effectively and for not being able to prevent blatantly wrong decisions and corruption.
You let us down badly, Mr.Prime Minister. You let us down badly.

B.Raman
 Update
History has a uncanny method of doing justice and now justice is done and sardar ManMOhan Singh is defeated and consigned to the dustbin of history. I am afraid history will judge this man harshly as he failed to lead the nation and ended up being the running dog of the Nehru-Gandhi family.

He allowed corruption to thrive and did nothing. Remember Nero fiddled while Rome was afire?  Man Mohan Singh will have a lot to answer at the bar of Indian history

Is the Black Man a More Potent Lover * 68

In a recent discussion at the US Club bar a retired brigadiar opined that the black man was more virile than most other men. That made me think nd I realized that the  human race has a number of species. Almost all of them evolved as per Darwins theory from the ape over a period of many thousands of years. Most of this development of the races because of the evolution from different species of apes also evolved differently.Thus we have the Chinese and Japanese races which are different from the white race and blacks.
The Black race generally is associated with Africa and because of the harsh climate and lack of development, led to this race having to struggle more to survive.This again is Darwins theory of the survival of the fittest. The black or the negroid race thus devolped greater physical characteristics than other races and in popular ideas a feeling grew that they are also more potent in the sexual field.
A review of hard core porn will show that the greatest demand is for a coupling of a black man with white or other woman. This fantasy is played to the ultimate hilt, though there is no scientific evidence to back this claim. What panders to this fantasy is the physical characteristics in terms of height and build of the black man which tower over other races. These physical attributes do not add to greater potency, but then in popular imagination a man or a woman would like to believe this is true.
This myth commenced from the plantations in the deep south of the USA, where the African was made to work day and night on the farm. The result of this hard labor , was a greater development of the muscular aspect of the body and the house ladies sitting in smug comfort of their mansions were attracted to these muscular slaves. Obviously in contrast to the sedate existence of the white master, the Black scored in physical built.
Another aspect that feeds this fantasy is the human minds desire to try the bizzare in life.This is also one of the reasons that the myth of the black man as a more potent lover has gained credance over more rational thought. But whatever the real fact, this myth of the black man being a more potent lover will not easily go away.
The Brigadier may be right or wrong , it really does not matter as popular perceptions die hard.

The Mulatto, an Archaic Word that Signifies an Offspring of a Black- White Relationship

 I have been reading a lot about the deep south in America. I learn't about the Mulatto from books on that region.Mulatto is an archaic word not much in use these days as it reminds people of slavery. but it is part of the dictionary. I remember one of my girl friends laughing and telling me that she was a mulatto ! That made me think and I realized that Mulatto was a term to denote an off spring of a relationship between a white and black of either sex. But in real terms particularly in the deep south of the USA , it was a one way relationship with black women and white men, who were the masters.
With the advent of slavery in the south and the large mansions and plantations, it was inevitable that the white masters would exploit the women on the plantations. This continued for a good part of a hundred years, till the concept of the black man as a bonded slave weakened. Black women who were young and comely were invariably exploited by the white master and his son for their pleasure. A lot many women had children who were termed mulatto’s. The sad part was that these Mulatto girls who were very beautiful again slept with their white masters in an incestuous relationship. In fact in New Orleans Mulato girls were in great demand by the whites.
As far as the Negro male was concerned, relationship with a white woman was taboo, as the whites guarded their women zealously. But some times a relationship did occur, the consequence of which was death for the black man. This is beautifully brought out in the novel ‘To kill a Mocking Bird', also made into a movie with Gregory Peck.
The Mulatto was an anachronism of history, and it is good that the word has gone into disuse. Its certainly not a credit to the whites in America and the Christian religion, that condoned these acts of the whites. The repercussions are there now in the form of Black militant organizations and the conversion of the Blacks to Islam.Perhaps this was inevitable

Can India have a Popular Uprising Like in Egypt ?

I sometimes wonder the reason for the Hindus( Majority of Indian population) being so subservient and obedient.  They accepted Moslem rule for 900 years and British rule for 200 years. It is a wonder that a large population of crores was governed by a comparative handful of people. Social scientists must study this aspect of the Hindu ethos. Why was there not a mass upsurge, that could have thrown these invaders in the Arabian sea. But it did not happen and that is a fact of history.
This is not to deny that individual warriors and local insurrections were not there, but by and large the masses remained passive and accepted their fate. A particular galling example is the massacre carried out by Timur-e-Lang, who in an invasion of India massacred 100,000 Hindus in North India in 1398. 
Perhaps this stoic acceptance of their fate has something to do with their religion and the caste system.  The religion as a philosophy is fine, but it teaches that the actions of man govern his future and killing an animal or a man is crime that will be punished. Secondly the caste system divided society and one class of people were not allowed to bear arms.
 But times are changing and there is awareness that people power has some meaning.  But the Hindus of India have a long way to go to change an ethos that has governed them for thousands of years. As such on the face of it a mass agitation like the one in Egypt does appear unlikely. There is rampant corruption, fissiperous tendencies and yet the masses have not done anything.  We have ministers who have swindled the nation for thousand's of crores of rupees and yet  the popular reaction is sadly missing. Frank Moraes wrote about the 'meek and mild ' Hindu, A man content to live his life the way it is, as it is 'written in the fate'. This concept must go and Hindu social reformers must change this ethos. There is the RSS, but it is not the vehicle to bring about the required change. We have to await a social reformer who will bring this about.

Why are American Negroes Converting to Islam ?

 Recently, I recieved a email from my friend in the USA that his neighbor a African American had converted to Islam. I was intrigued by this and realized that a lot many Blacks are converting to Islam. We must remember thatGeorge Washington led the war of Independence and the United States became a free country in 1776. America was virgin land and the white settlers opened up the country with plantations and factories. Thus there was a need for cheap labor. To get this cheap labor, a nefarious scheme to abduct and kidnap black men was commissioned. These Blacks were kidnapped from the African continent and brought to America to work on the plantations and estates. There status was that of slaves.

The masters of these slaves were all white men who regularly went to Church and were good Christians. The priests who gave sermons from the pulpits, found nothing wrong in this slavery of the black man.  These so called men of God did nothing about this. The civil war brought no respite and this slavery continued in the deep south. But over a period of time with the advent of 2 world wars a slackening of the hold on the Blacks was evident and a civil rights movement gathered steam as the Black man bid for his rights.

The transition was not easy and white supremacy organizations like the KKK appeared who killed blacks without compunction. The sad part is that these men  were good Christians and yet the black man was discriminated against. The Christian religion has a lot to answer for the state of the Black man in America for nearly 200 years or more.

There was bound to be a backlash and now the Blacks are converting to Islam. It started with Cassius clay becoming Muhammad Ali and now it has grown like ivy.This conversion is a failure of the Christian religion which is not a white mans preserve, as it has happened in America.